What To Know
- The Microsoft Band, on the other hand, presented a more robust and tech-forward design, boasting a larger, curved display and a more substantial wristband.
- If you’re looking for a simple, comfortable, and long-lasting fitness tracker with a focus on core fitness metrics, the Garmin Vivosmart is a solid choice.
- The Garmin Vivosmart and Microsoft Band were pioneers in the fitness tracker market, laying the foundation for the sophisticated devices we see today.
Choosing the right fitness tracker can be a daunting task, especially with the wide array of options available. Two popular contenders in 2015 were the Garmin Vivosmart and the Microsoft Band. Both devices promised to empower users with comprehensive fitness tracking and insightful data. But which one emerged as the superior choice? This blog post delves into a head-to-head comparison of the Garmin Vivosmart vs Microsoft Band 2015, analyzing their features, performance, and overall value proposition to help you make an informed decision.
Design and Comfort
The Garmin Vivosmart sported a sleek and minimalist design, featuring a thin, rectangular display and a comfortable, adjustable wristband. Its understated aesthetic made it suitable for both casual wear and athletic activities. The Microsoft Band, on the other hand, presented a more robust and tech-forward design, boasting a larger, curved display and a more substantial wristband. While the Band’s design was distinctive, some users found it bulky and less comfortable for prolonged wear.
Display and User Interface
The Garmin Vivosmart’s display was a monochrome OLED screen, offering decent visibility in most lighting conditions. However, its small size and lack of color made it less visually appealing compared to the Microsoft Band. The Band’s display was a vibrant, color touchscreen, providing a more immersive user experience. Its larger size and touch functionality allowed for easier navigation and interaction with the device’s various features.
Fitness Tracking Capabilities
Both trackers excelled in fitness tracking, offering a comprehensive suite of features. The Garmin Vivosmart accurately monitored steps, distance, calories burned, and sleep patterns. It also included heart rate monitoring, although its accuracy was often criticized. The Microsoft Band went a step further by incorporating a more advanced heart rate sensor, providing more accurate and detailed readings. It also offered additional fitness tracking features like GPS for outdoor workouts and workout detection, automatically recognizing specific exercises.
Smart Features and Notifications
While primarily fitness trackers, both devices offered smart features to enhance their functionality. The Garmin Vivosmart provided basic notifications for calls, texts, and calendar events. It also featured a move bar that encouraged users to stay active throughout the day. The Microsoft Band took smart features to another level, integrating with Cortana for voice commands, providing weather updates, and even controlling music playback. Its ability to display emails and social media notifications made it a more versatile smartwatch-like device.
Battery Life
The Garmin Vivosmart boasted an impressive battery life, lasting for up to seven days on a single charge. This long-lasting battery made it a convenient choice for users who didn’t want to worry about frequent charging. The Microsoft Band, however, had a significantly shorter battery life, lasting only around two days on a single charge. Its dependence on frequent charging could be a major drawback for some users.
Price and Value
The Garmin Vivosmart was priced more competitively than the Microsoft Band, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious consumers. Its lower price point, combined with its solid fitness tracking capabilities, offered decent value for money. The Microsoft Band, on the other hand, commanded a higher price tag, reflecting its more advanced features and smartwatch-like functionality. Its premium price could be a barrier for some users, especially those primarily seeking a basic fitness tracker.
The Verdict: Which Reigns Supreme?
Ultimately, the choice between the Garmin Vivosmart and the Microsoft Band 2015 depends on individual preferences and priorities. If you’re looking for a simple, comfortable, and long-lasting fitness tracker with a focus on core fitness metrics, the Garmin Vivosmart is a solid choice. However, if you desire a more feature-rich device with advanced fitness tracking, smart features, and a vibrant display, the Microsoft Band offers a compelling alternative.
Beyond the Comparison: A Look at the Evolution of Fitness Trackers
The Garmin Vivosmart and Microsoft Band were pioneers in the fitness tracker market, laying the foundation for the sophisticated devices we see today. Since their release, both companies have continued to innovate, releasing newer versions with improved features and functionalities.
Garmin has expanded its fitness tracker lineup with models like the Vivosmart 4, Vivosport, and Vivofit 4, each catering to different needs and budgets. Microsoft, however, discontinued the Band series in 2016, choosing to focus on other wearable technology ventures. The evolution of fitness trackers has been remarkable, with advancements in sensor technology, integration with smartphones, and the development of personalized health insights.
Final Thoughts: A Legacy of Innovation
The Garmin Vivosmart and Microsoft Band 2015 may no longer be the cutting-edge devices they once were, but their legacy lives on. They paved the way for the sophisticated fitness trackers we use today, demonstrating the power of technology to empower individuals to take control of their health and well-being. As the fitness tracker market continues to evolve, it’s fascinating to see how these early pioneers paved the way for the future of wearable technology.
Top Questions Asked
Q: What are the key differences between the Garmin Vivosmart and Microsoft Band 2015?
A: The Garmin Vivosmart focused on core fitness tracking with a simple design and long battery life, while the Microsoft Band offered a more advanced feature set, including a color touchscreen, GPS, and smart notifications.
Q: Which fitness tracker is better for casual users?
A: The Garmin Vivosmart is a better choice for casual users who prioritize simplicity, comfort, and long battery life.
Q: Which fitness tracker is better for serious athletes?
A: The Microsoft Band 2015 offered more advanced fitness tracking features, including GPS and a more accurate heart rate sensor, making it a better choice for serious athletes.
Q: Are the Garmin Vivosmart and Microsoft Band 2015 still available?
A: Both devices have been discontinued by their respective manufacturers. However, you may still find them available on pre-owned or refurbished markets.
Q: What are some popular fitness tracker alternatives to the Garmin Vivosmart and Microsoft Band 2015?
A: Some popular alternatives include the Fitbit Charge 4, the Garmin Vivosmart 4, the Amazfit Band 5, and the Samsung Galaxy Fit 2.