Fastrack Reflex 3.0 vs Fitbit Charge 2: Which One Will Give You the Best Fitness Tracking Experience?

Choosing the right fitness tracker can be a daunting task, especially with the plethora of options available. If you’re looking for a reliable and feature-rich tracker that won’t break the bank, the Fastrack Reflex 3.0 and Fitbit Charge 2 are two popular contenders. Both devices offer a range of fitness tracking capabilities, but which one comes out on top? This comprehensive comparison will delve into the key features, pros and cons, and ultimately help you decide which tracker best suits your needs.

Design and Display

The Fastrack Reflex 3.0 boasts a sleek and minimalist design, featuring a rectangular display with a comfortable silicone band. It’s lightweight and comfortable to wear even during sleep. The Fitbit Charge 2, on the other hand, sports a more traditional fitness tracker design with a larger, curved OLED display. It’s available in a variety of band colors and materials, allowing for more customization.
Fastrack Reflex 3.0:

• Pros: Sleek and minimalist design, lightweight and comfortable.
• Cons: Smaller display, limited customization options.

Fitbit Charge 2:

• Pros: Larger, curved OLED display, customizable band options.
• Cons: Can feel bulky for some users.

Activity Tracking and Features

Both trackers excel in activity tracking, providing accurate data on steps, distance, calories burned, and active minutes. However, the Fitbit Charge 2 offers a wider range of features, including:

• Heart Rate Tracking: The Fitbit Charge 2 utilizes PurePulse technology for continuous heart rate monitoring, allowing you to track your heart rate zones, resting heart rate, and even calculate your VO2 Max.
• Sleep Tracking: Both trackers monitor your sleep duration and quality, but the Fitbit Charge 2 provides a more detailed breakdown of your sleep stages (light, deep, REM).
• Smart Notifications: The Fitbit Charge 2 allows you to receive notifications from your smartphone, including calls, texts, and app alerts.
• Connected GPS: While the Fastrack Reflex 3.0 relies on your phone’s GPS for location tracking, the Fitbit Charge 2 has built-in GPS, allowing for more accurate distance tracking during outdoor activities.
• Exercise Modes: The Fitbit Charge 2 offers a wider range of exercise modes, including running, cycling, swimming, and more, with specific metrics for each activity.

Fastrack Reflex 3.0:

• Pros: Accurate step counting, distance tracking, and calorie burn estimations.
• Cons: Limited exercise modes, no heart rate tracking, no connected GPS.

Fitbit Charge 2:

• Pros: Comprehensive activity tracking, heart rate monitoring, connected GPS, sleep stage analysis, smart notifications, and a variety of exercise modes.
• Cons: More expensive than the Fastrack Reflex 3.0.

Battery Life

The Fastrack Reflex 3.0 boasts an impressive battery life of up to 7 days on a single charge. The Fitbit Charge 2, while offering more features, has a slightly shorter battery life of around 5 days.
Fastrack Reflex 3.0:

• Pros: Long battery life of up to 7 days.
• Cons: N/A

Fitbit Charge 2:

• Pros: Decent battery life of around 5 days.
• Cons: Shorter battery life compared to the Fastrack Reflex 3.0.

Water Resistance

Both trackers are water-resistant, but the Fitbit Charge 2 offers a higher level of protection. The Fastrack Reflex 3.0 is splash-proof, making it suitable for everyday wear and light rain, but it’s not recommended for swimming. The Fitbit Charge 2, on the other hand, is swim-proof up to 50 meters, allowing you to track your swims and even use it in the shower.
Fastrack Reflex 3.0:

• Pros: Splash-proof.
• Cons: Not suitable for swimming.

Fitbit Charge 2:

• Pros: Swim-proof up to 50 meters.
• Cons: N/A

Price and Value

The Fastrack Reflex 3.0 is a more affordable option, making it an attractive choice for budget-conscious users. The Fitbit Charge 2, with its advanced features, comes at a higher price point.
Fastrack Reflex 3.0:

• Pros: Affordable price.
• Cons: N/A

Fitbit Charge 2:

• Pros: Comprehensive features.
• Cons: More expensive than the Fastrack Reflex 3.0.

The Verdict: Which One Should You Choose?

Ultimately, the best fitness tracker for you depends on your individual needs and preferences. If you’re looking for a basic, affordable tracker with a long battery life, the Fastrack Reflex 3.0 is a solid choice. However, if you prioritize advanced features like heart rate tracking, connected GPS, and sleep stage analysis, the Fitbit Charge 2 is the superior option.

Final Thoughts: Choosing Your Fitness Companion

The Fastrack Reflex 3.0 and Fitbit Charge 2 represent different ends of the fitness tracker spectrum. The Fastrack Reflex 3.0 excels in simplicity and affordability, while the Fitbit Charge 2 shines with its comprehensive features and detailed data. By carefully considering your needs and budget, you can choose the perfect fitness companion to help you reach your goals.

Answers to Your Most Common Questions

Q: Can I use the Fastrack Reflex 3.0 for swimming?
A: No, the Fastrack Reflex 3.0 is only splash-proof and not suitable for swimming.
Q: Does the Fitbit Charge 2 have a built-in GPS?
A: Yes, the Fitbit Charge 2 has connected GPS, which allows for more accurate distance tracking during outdoor activities.
Q: What is the difference between the Fastrack Reflex 3.0 and the Fastrack Reflex 3.0 Plus?
A: The Fastrack Reflex 3.0 Plus features a larger display and additional features like heart rate tracking and sleep monitoring.
Q: Can I use the Fitbit Charge 2 to receive notifications from my phone?
A: Yes, the Fitbit Charge 2 allows you to receive notifications from your smartphone, including calls, texts, and app alerts.
Q: Which tracker has a longer battery life?
A: The Fastrack Reflex 3.0 has a longer battery life of up to 7 days compared to the Fitbit Charge 2’s 5 days.