What To Know
- The Epson Pulsense PS-100 boasts a sleek and minimalist design, featuring a rectangular display with a single button for navigation.
- The Pulsense PS-100 uses a 3-axis accelerometer to accurately track your movements, while the Striiv Touch utilizes a combination of sensors for more comprehensive data capture.
- However, if you prefer a more visually appealing device with a touchscreen interface, advanced smart features, and social media integration, the Striiv Touch might be a better fit.
Choosing the right fitness tracker can be a daunting task, especially with so many options available. Two popular contenders in the market are the Epson Pulsense PS-100 and the Striiv Touch. Both devices offer a range of features and functionalities to help you track your fitness progress, but which one comes out on top? This comprehensive comparison will delve into the key aspects of each tracker to help you make an informed decision.
Design and Comfort
The Epson Pulsense PS-100 boasts a sleek and minimalist design, featuring a rectangular display with a single button for navigation. It’s lightweight and comfortable to wear, thanks to its soft silicone band that comes in multiple colors. The Striiv Touch, on the other hand, adopts a more rounded design with a touchscreen interface. It’s also lightweight and comfortable, but its larger size might feel slightly bulkier than the Pulsense PS-100.
Display and Interface
The Pulsense PS-100 features a monochrome OLED display that’s crisp and easy to read, even in bright sunlight. However, it’s relatively small, limiting the amount of information displayed at a time. The Striiv Touch, with its color touchscreen, offers a more vibrant and visually appealing experience. It displays a wider range of data and allows for more intuitive navigation.
Activity Tracking
Both trackers excel in activity tracking, monitoring steps, distance, calories burned, and sleep patterns. The Pulsense PS-100 uses a 3-axis accelerometer to accurately track your movements, while the Striiv Touch utilizes a combination of sensors for more comprehensive data capture. Both devices also offer automatic activity recognition, detecting different activities like walking, running, and cycling.
Heart Rate Monitoring
The Pulsense PS-100 includes a built-in optical heart rate sensor, allowing you to monitor your heart rate throughout the day and during workouts. The Striiv Touch, however, lacks this feature, relying on third-party apps for heart rate tracking. If heart rate monitoring is crucial for your fitness goals, the Pulsense PS-100 emerges as the clear winner.
Smart Features
Both trackers offer basic smart notifications, alerting you to incoming calls, messages, and app notifications. The Pulsense PS-100 also includes a music playback control feature, allowing you to adjust the volume and skip tracks on your smartphone. The Striiv Touch, on the other hand, offers more advanced features like social media integration, allowing you to connect with friends and share your fitness achievements.
Battery Life
The Pulsense PS-100 boasts an impressive battery life of up to 7 days on a single charge. This makes it a great choice for travelers or those who don’t want to constantly worry about charging their device. The Striiv Touch, however, has a significantly shorter battery life, lasting only 3-4 days.
Water Resistance
Both the Pulsense PS-100 and the Striiv Touch are water-resistant, with an IP67 rating. This means they can withstand splashes and brief immersions in water, but aren’t suitable for swimming.
Price and Availability
The Pulsense PS-100 is generally priced lower than the Striiv Touch, making it a more budget-friendly option. Both devices are readily available online and at major retailers.
Final Thoughts: Which Tracker is Right for You?
Choosing between the Epson Pulsense PS-100 and the Striiv Touch ultimately comes down to your individual needs and preferences. If you prioritize a simple, comfortable, and long-lasting tracker with built-in heart rate monitoring, the Pulsense PS-100 is a solid choice. However, if you prefer a more visually appealing device with a touchscreen interface, advanced smart features, and social media integration, the Striiv Touch might be a better fit.
A Final Word: Beyond the Stats
While specifications and features are important, remember that the best fitness tracker is the one that motivates you to stay active and reach your goals. Consider your lifestyle, fitness level, and personal preferences when making your decision. Ultimately, the most important factor is finding a tracker that you enjoy using and that inspires you to live a healthier life.
What You Need to Learn
Q: What are the compatible apps for the Epson Pulsense PS-100 and Striiv Touch?
A: The Pulsense PS-100 is compatible with the Epson Connect app, available for both iOS and Android devices. The Striiv Touch works with the Striiv app, which is also available for iOS and Android.
Q: Can I use the Epson Pulsense PS-100 and Striiv Touch for swimming?
A: Both trackers are water-resistant but not waterproof. They are suitable for splashes and brief immersions but not for swimming.
Q: Which tracker is better for tracking sleep?
A: Both trackers offer sleep tracking features. The Pulsense PS-100 uses a 3-axis accelerometer to monitor your sleep patterns, while the Striiv Touch uses a combination of sensors for more comprehensive data capture.
Q: Can I customize the watch faces on these trackers?
A: The Pulsense PS-100 offers a limited number of pre-set watch faces. The Striiv Touch allows for more customization options, including the ability to select from a wider range of watch faces or create your own.
Q: What are the pros and cons of each tracker?
A:
Epson Pulsense PS-100:
Pros:
- Long battery life
- Built-in heart rate monitor
- Comfortable and lightweight design
- Affordable price
Cons:
- Small monochrome display
- Limited smart features
- No touchscreen interface
Striiv Touch:
Pros:
- Color touchscreen display
- Advanced smart features
- Social media integration
- More customization options
Cons:
- Shorter battery life
- No built-in heart rate monitor
- Larger and slightly bulkier design