What To Know
- The ZeTrack, on the other hand, opts for a more rugged and sporty look with a circular display and a textured silicone strap.
- The Equator boasts a remarkable battery life of up to 14 days on a single charge, making it a reliable companion for extended trips and adventures.
- However, if you prefer a rugged and sporty design, a more affordable price point, and a reliable fitness tracker for everyday use, the MyKronoz ZeTrack is a solid choice.
Choosing the right fitness tracker can be a daunting task, with a plethora of options available in the market. Two popular contenders often found in the mix are the Amazfit Equator and the MyKronoz ZeTrack. Both devices offer a compelling blend of features and affordability, making it difficult to decide which one truly reigns supreme. This comprehensive comparison delves into the strengths and weaknesses of each tracker, helping you make an informed decision based on your individual needs and preferences.
Design and Display: A Tale of Two Styles
The Amazfit Equator and MyKronoz ZeTrack present distinct design philosophies. The Equator boasts a sleek, minimalist aesthetic, featuring a rectangular display with rounded edges. Its lightweight design and comfortable silicone strap make it ideal for everyday wear. The ZeTrack, on the other hand, opts for a more rugged and sporty look with a circular display and a textured silicone strap. This design choice makes it a more suitable option for intense workouts and outdoor activities.
In terms of display, the Equator offers a larger 1.69-inch color touchscreen, providing a more immersive visual experience. The ZeTrack, however, utilizes a smaller, monochrome display, which might feel a bit cramped for some users. Despite the smaller size, the ZeTrack’s display is still quite legible, even under bright sunlight.
Activity Tracking: Keeping You on Track
Both the Amazfit Equator and MyKronoz ZeTrack excel in activity tracking, offering a comprehensive suite of features to monitor your fitness progress. They both accurately track steps, distance, calories burned, and sleep patterns. They also include heart rate monitoring, allowing you to gauge your cardiovascular health and optimize your workouts.
The Equator takes things a step further by incorporating GPS for more precise outdoor tracking, making it an excellent choice for runners and cyclists. The ZeTrack, however, relies on GPS connectivity through your smartphone, which can impact battery life and accuracy.
Smart Features: Beyond Fitness Tracking
While primarily designed for fitness tracking, both devices offer a range of smart features to enhance your daily life. The Amazfit Equator shines with its extensive smart notifications, allowing you to receive calls, messages, and app alerts directly on your wrist. It also supports music playback control, enabling you to adjust your tunes without reaching for your phone.
The MyKronoz ZeTrack, on the other hand, focuses on essential smart features. It provides basic notifications for calls and messages, but lacks music playback control. It also features a built-in alarm clock and a timer, making it a convenient companion for everyday tasks.
Battery Life: Staying Powered Up
Battery life is a crucial factor for any fitness tracker, and both the Amazfit Equator and MyKronoz ZeTrack deliver impressive performance in this regard. The Equator boasts a remarkable battery life of up to 14 days on a single charge, making it a reliable companion for extended trips and adventures. The ZeTrack offers a slightly shorter battery life of up to 7 days, still sufficient for most users.
Price and Value: Making the Right Choice
The Amazfit Equator and MyKronoz ZeTrack are both budget-friendly fitness trackers, offering excellent value for their respective price points. The Equator typically retails at a slightly higher price than the ZeTrack, but its superior features and longer battery life justify the cost for many users. The ZeTrack, however, provides a more affordable option for those seeking a basic yet reliable fitness tracker.
Takeaways: Choosing the Right Fit
The choice between the Amazfit Equator and MyKronoz ZeTrack ultimately depends on your individual needs and priorities. If you prioritize a sleek design, a larger display, extensive smart features, and exceptional battery life, the Amazfit Equator is the clear winner. However, if you prefer a rugged and sporty design, a more affordable price point, and a reliable fitness tracker for everyday use, the MyKronoz ZeTrack is a solid choice.
Questions You May Have
Q: What is the difference in water resistance between the two trackers?
A: The Amazfit Equator is water-resistant up to 5 ATM, making it suitable for swimming and showering. The MyKronoz ZeTrack is also water-resistant, but only up to 3 ATM, meaning it can withstand splashes and rain but is not suitable for swimming.
Q: Do both trackers support smartphone connectivity?
A: Yes, both the Amazfit Equator and MyKronoz ZeTrack connect to smartphones via Bluetooth.
Q: Which tracker offers more advanced sleep monitoring features?
A: The Amazfit Equator provides more detailed sleep tracking data, including sleep stages (light, deep, REM) and heart rate variability during sleep. The MyKronoz ZeTrack offers basic sleep tracking, but lacks the advanced features of the Equator.
Q: Can I customize watch faces on both trackers?
A: The Amazfit Equator allows you to customize watch faces through its companion app. The MyKronoz ZeTrack does not offer watch face customization.
Q: Which tracker is better for outdoor activities?
A: The Amazfit Equator is a better choice for outdoor activities due to its built-in GPS, which enables more accurate tracking of your routes and distances. The MyKronoz ZeTrack relies on smartphone GPS, which can be less reliable and impact battery life.