What To Know
- If you’re looking for a simple, affordable, and reliable companion to track your activity and sleep, the Amazfit Neo vs MyKronoz ZeTrack comparison is a good place to start.
- Both trackers offer comfortable and durable designs, with the Amazfit Neo leaning towards a classic look and the MyKronoz ZeTrack opting for a more modern and sporty aesthetic.
- The Amazfit Neo boasts an impressive battery life of up to 30 days on a single charge, making it an ideal choice for users who don’t want to worry about frequent charging.
Choosing the right fitness tracker can be a daunting task, especially with the plethora of options available in the market. If you’re looking for a simple, affordable, and reliable companion to track your activity and sleep, the Amazfit Neo vs MyKronoz ZeTrack comparison is a good place to start. Both trackers offer a compelling blend of features and affordability, making them strong contenders in the budget-friendly fitness tracker category. This blog post will delve deep into the key features, pros and cons, and overall value proposition of each tracker, helping you make an informed decision.
Design and Build Quality
Amazfit Neo boasts a classic digital watch design with a rectangular display and a comfortable, lightweight plastic build. It comes in several color options, allowing you to choose a style that fits your personality. The Neo’s design is reminiscent of a classic digital watch, making it a stylish and discreet option for everyday wear.
MyKronoz ZeTrack takes a slightly different approach with a circular display and a more modern, minimalist design. It features a soft silicone strap that feels comfortable on the wrist and offers a secure fit. The ZeTrack’s design is more contemporary and sporty, making it a good choice for those who prefer a more athletic look.
Verdict: Both trackers offer comfortable and durable designs, with the Amazfit Neo leaning towards a classic look and the MyKronoz ZeTrack opting for a more modern and sporty aesthetic. The choice ultimately comes down to personal preference.
Display and User Interface
The Amazfit Neo features a monochrome LCD display that is easy to read, even in bright sunlight. The interface is simple and intuitive, with clear icons and straightforward navigation. It displays basic information like time, date, steps, distance, calories burned, heart rate, and sleep data.
The MyKronoz ZeTrack also boasts a monochrome LCD display, although it is slightly larger than the Neo’s. The ZeTrack’s interface is equally user-friendly, with a clear and concise layout. It displays similar information to the Neo, including time, date, steps, distance, calories burned, heart rate, and sleep data.
Verdict: Both trackers offer clear and readable displays, making it easy to access essential data. The ZeTrack’s slightly larger display might be preferred by users who want more visual information.
Activity Tracking
Both the Amazfit Neo and the **MyKronoz ZeTrack** excel in basic activity tracking. They accurately track steps, distance, calories burned, and active minutes. Both trackers also offer automatic activity recognition, which can detect different types of activities like walking, running, and cycling.
Verdict: Both trackers perform well in activity tracking, providing accurate and reliable data. The choice between the two comes down to personal preference and the specific features you prioritize.
Sleep Tracking
Amazfit Neo offers basic sleep tracking, recording your sleep duration and light/deep sleep phases. It provides a simple sleep score that gives you a general idea of your sleep quality.
MyKronoz ZeTrack takes sleep tracking a step further by also monitoring REM sleep, providing a more detailed analysis of your sleep patterns. It also features a smart alarm that wakes you up during your lightest sleep phase, promoting a more refreshed morning.
Verdict: The MyKronoz ZeTrack offers more comprehensive sleep tracking features, providing a deeper insight into your sleep patterns and offering a smart alarm for a smoother wake-up experience.
Heart Rate Monitoring
Both the Amazfit Neo and the **MyKronoz ZeTrack** offer continuous heart rate monitoring. The Neo uses a built-in optical sensor to track your heart rate throughout the day, providing data for resting heart rate, heart rate variability, and heart rate zones during workouts.
The ZeTrack also utilizes an optical sensor to track your heart rate, offering similar functionalities to the Neo. However, it also features a built-in SpO2 sensor that measures blood oxygen saturation levels, providing valuable insights into your overall health and fitness.
Verdict: While both trackers offer heart rate monitoring, the MyKronoz ZeTrack‘s inclusion of SpO2 monitoring adds a significant advantage, providing a more comprehensive health picture.
Battery Life
The Amazfit Neo boasts an impressive battery life of up to 30 days on a single charge, making it an ideal choice for users who don’t want to worry about frequent charging.
The MyKronoz ZeTrack offers a slightly shorter battery life of up to 10 days on a single charge. While still commendable, this is significantly shorter than the Neo’s battery life.
Verdict: The Amazfit Neo wins this round with its exceptional battery life, offering weeks of use without needing to charge.
Connectivity and Features
Both the Amazfit Neo and the **MyKronoz ZeTrack** connect to smartphones via Bluetooth. They offer basic notifications for calls, messages, and app alerts.
The Amazfit Neo also supports music playback control, allowing you to control music on your smartphone directly from the tracker.
Verdict: Both trackers offer similar connectivity and features, with the Amazfit Neo offering an added advantage with music playback control.
Pricing and Value
Both the Amazfit Neo and the **MyKronoz ZeTrack** are available at budget-friendly prices, making them accessible to a wide range of users. The Amazfit Neo is typically priced slightly lower than the ZeTrack.
Verdict: Both trackers offer excellent value for their price, providing a compelling blend of features and affordability. The choice between the two comes down to your budget and the specific features you prioritize.
Choosing the Right Tracker for You
The decision between the Amazfit Neo and the **MyKronoz ZeTrack** depends on your individual needs and preferences. Here’s a quick breakdown to help you decide:
Choose the Amazfit Neo if:
- You prioritize long battery life.
- You prefer a classic and discreet design.
- You’re looking for a budget-friendly option.
Choose the MyKronoz ZeTrack if:
- You want more comprehensive sleep tracking.
- You value SpO2 monitoring for health insights.
- You prefer a more modern and sporty design.
The Final Verdict: Which One Wins?
Both the Amazfit Neo and the **MyKronoz ZeTrack** are excellent fitness trackers that offer a lot of value for their price. The Amazfit Neo wins out with its exceptional battery life and classic design, while the MyKronoz ZeTrack offers more advanced sleep tracking and SpO2 monitoring. Ultimately, the best choice for you depends on your specific needs and priorities.
What You Need to Know
Q: Does the Amazfit Neo have GPS?
A: No, the Amazfit Neo does not have built-in GPS. It relies on your smartphone’s GPS for location tracking during workouts.
Q: Can I use the MyKronoz ZeTrack for swimming?
A: No, the MyKronoz ZeTrack is not waterproof and is not designed for swimming.
Q: How accurate is the heart rate monitoring on both trackers?
A: Both trackers offer relatively accurate heart rate monitoring, but they may not be as precise as dedicated heart rate monitors.
Q: What are the main differences between the Amazfit Neo and the MyKronoz ZeTrack?
A: The main differences lie in the battery life, sleep tracking features, and the inclusion of SpO2 monitoring in the ZeTrack. The Neo offers longer battery life and a classic design, while the ZeTrack provides more detailed sleep insights and SpO2 monitoring for health insights.
Q: Can I use both trackers with different smartphones?
A: Yes, both trackers are compatible with both Android and iOS smartphones.