What To Know
- This blog post will delve into a detailed comparison of the Amazfit Band 2 vs Polar A370, helping you make an informed decision based on your individual needs and preferences.
- The Amazfit Band 2 offers a water resistance rating of 5ATM, while the Polar A370 has a rating of 3ATM.
- The Amazfit Band 2 is generally more budget-friendly than the Polar A370, making it an attractive option for users on a tighter budget.
Choosing the right fitness tracker can be a daunting task, especially with the plethora of options available. Two popular contenders in the budget-friendly segment are the Amazfit Band 2 and the Polar A370. Both devices offer a comprehensive suite of fitness tracking features, but they differ in their strengths and weaknesses. This blog post will delve into a detailed comparison of the Amazfit Band 2 vs Polar A370, helping you make an informed decision based on your individual needs and preferences.
Design and Comfort: A Tale of Two Styles
The Amazfit Band 2 and the Polar A370 sport distinct aesthetics. The Amazfit Band 2 embraces a minimalist design with a sleek, rectangular display and a comfortable silicone strap. Its lightweight construction makes it ideal for all-day wear, even during sleep. On the other hand, the Polar A370 boasts a more traditional round watch face with a larger, colorful touchscreen. While it offers a more prominent look, some users might find it slightly bulkier than the Amazfit Band 2.
Display: Clarity and Functionality
Both devices feature vibrant color displays that are easy to read, even under direct sunlight. The Amazfit Band 2’s rectangular display provides more real estate for displaying information, making it easier to navigate through menus and view data. The Polar A370’s round display, while aesthetically pleasing, might limit the amount of information displayed at a glance.
Activity Tracking: Tracking Your Every Move
Both the Amazfit Band 2 and the Polar A370 excel in activity tracking. They accurately record steps, distance, calories burned, and active minutes. The Amazfit Band 2 goes a step further by offering automatic workout detection, recognizing activities like running, walking, and cycling. The Polar A370, however, takes the crown in heart rate monitoring with its built-in optical heart rate sensor, providing more accurate and detailed data.
Sleep Tracking: Monitoring Your Restful Hours
Both fitness trackers offer sleep tracking capabilities, monitoring your sleep duration, quality, and sleep stages. The Amazfit Band 2 provides basic sleep insights, while the Polar A370 goes deeper, offering more detailed analysis of your sleep patterns. This feature is particularly useful for users who are looking to optimize their sleep quality.
GPS: Navigating Your Way
The Amazfit Band 2 relies on connected GPS, utilizing your smartphone’s GPS to track your outdoor workouts. This approach can be convenient but might drain your phone’s battery. The Polar A370, on the other hand, features built-in GPS, allowing you to track your outdoor runs and walks without the need for your phone.
Battery Life: Staying Powered Up
The Amazfit Band 2 boasts an impressive battery life, lasting up to 20 days on a single charge. This extended battery life is a significant advantage for users who don’t want to constantly worry about charging their fitness tracker. The Polar A370, however, has a shorter battery life, lasting around 4-5 days.
Water Resistance: Taking the Plunge
Both the Amazfit Band 2 and the Polar A370 are water-resistant, allowing you to wear them during swimming and other water activities. The Amazfit Band 2 offers a water resistance rating of 5ATM, while the Polar A370 has a rating of 3ATM. This means the Amazfit Band 2 can withstand slightly deeper water pressure.
Software and Features: A Comparison of Capabilities
The Amazfit Band 2 is compatible with both Android and iOS devices, offering a user-friendly app for data analysis and customization. It also supports various watch faces, allowing you to personalize your device’s aesthetic. The Polar A370 also boasts a comprehensive app, providing detailed insights into your fitness data, sleep patterns, and workout performance.
Price: Finding the Right Value
The Amazfit Band 2 is generally more budget-friendly than the Polar A370, making it an attractive option for users on a tighter budget. However, the Polar A370 offers a more premium experience with its advanced features and build quality.
Final Thoughts: The Verdict is In
The choice between the Amazfit Band 2 and the Polar A370 ultimately depends on your individual needs and priorities. If you’re looking for an affordable fitness tracker with long battery life, the Amazfit Band 2 is an excellent choice. However, if you prioritize accurate heart rate monitoring, built-in GPS, and a more detailed analysis of your fitness data, the Polar A370 might be the better option.
Quick Answers to Your FAQs
Q: Which fitness tracker is better for tracking sleep?
A: The Polar A370 offers more comprehensive sleep tracking capabilities, providing detailed insights into your sleep patterns.
Q: Which fitness tracker has a better battery life?
A: The Amazfit Band 2 boasts a significantly longer battery life, lasting up to 20 days on a single charge.
Q: Which fitness tracker is better for outdoor workouts?
A: The Polar A370 has built-in GPS, making it more convenient for tracking outdoor workouts without the need for your phone.
Q: Which fitness tracker is more budget-friendly?
A: The Amazfit Band 2 is generally more affordable than the Polar A370.
Q: Which fitness tracker is better for overall fitness tracking?
A: Both fitness trackers offer excellent overall fitness tracking features, but the Polar A370 excels in heart rate monitoring and provides more detailed data analysis.