What To Know
- While the Fit Smart lacks a heart rate sensor, the Alta HR boasts a built-in PurePulse heart rate monitor.
- If you’re looking for a sleek and affordable tracker with accurate activity tracking, the Fit Smart is a great option.
- If you’re a casual user looking for a stylish and affordable tracker to monitor your activity levels, the Fit Smart might be perfect.
Choosing the right fitness tracker can be a daunting task, especially with the plethora of options available in the market. If you’re torn between the adidas miCoach Fit Smart and the **Fitbit Alta HR**, you’ve come to the right place. This comprehensive comparison will delve into the features, pros, and cons of each tracker, helping you make an informed decision based on your individual needs and preferences.
Design and Comfort
Both the adidas miCoach Fit Smart and the Fitbit Alta HR boast sleek and stylish designs. The Fit Smart features a rectangular display with interchangeable bands, allowing you to personalize your look. The Alta HR, on the other hand, boasts a slim, elegant design with a vibrant color touchscreen display.
In terms of comfort, both trackers are lightweight and comfortable to wear. The Fit Smart‘s strap is slightly thicker than the Alta HR’s, which might feel more secure for some users. Ultimately, the choice comes down to personal preference and the overall aesthetic you’re aiming for.
Activity Tracking
Both trackers excel in activity tracking, accurately monitoring steps taken, distance covered, calories burned, and active minutes. The Fit Smart utilizes an accelerometer to track movement, while the Alta HR uses a tri-axis accelerometer for more precise tracking.
Both trackers also offer sleep tracking, providing insights into your sleep patterns, including time spent in light, deep, and REM sleep. The Alta HR goes a step further by incorporating a heart rate sensor, which allows for more detailed sleep analysis.
Heart Rate Monitoring
While the Fit Smart lacks a heart rate sensor, the Alta HR boasts a built-in PurePulse heart rate monitor. This feature provides continuous heart rate tracking throughout the day, allowing you to monitor your heart rate during workouts, sleep, and even during everyday activities.
The Alta HR’s heart rate sensor also enables more accurate calorie burn calculations, providing a more personalized view of your fitness progress.
Smart Features
Both trackers offer a range of smart features to enhance your daily life. The Fit Smart allows you to receive notifications from your smartphone, including calls, texts, and app alerts. It also features a music control function, allowing you to adjust your music playback directly from your wrist.
The Alta HR also provides smartphone notifications, along with call rejection capabilities. It also features a silent alarm, allowing you to wake up without disturbing others. Additionally, the Alta HR offers a “Reminders to Move” feature, encouraging you to get up and move every hour to combat sedentary behavior.
Battery Life
The battery life of both trackers is impressive, lasting for multiple days on a single charge. The Fit Smart boasts a battery life of up to 5 days, while the Alta HR offers up to 7 days of battery life. Both trackers are also compatible with various smartphone operating systems, including Android and iOS.
Pros and Cons
adidas miCoach Fit Smart
Pros:
- Sleek and stylish design
- Interchangeable bands for personalization
- Accurate activity tracking
- Long battery life
- Affordable price point
Cons:
- Lacks heart rate sensor
- Limited smart features compared to Alta HR
Fitbit Alta HR
Pros:
- Stylish and comfortable design
- Accurate activity and heart rate tracking
- Comprehensive sleep analysis
- Advanced smart features
- Long battery life
Cons:
- More expensive than Fit Smart
- Not as customizable as Fit Smart
The Verdict: Which Tracker Wins?
Choosing between the adidas miCoach Fit Smart and the Fitbit Alta HR ultimately depends on your individual needs and preferences. If you’re looking for a sleek and affordable tracker with accurate activity tracking, the Fit Smart is a great option. However, if you prioritize heart rate monitoring, advanced sleep analysis, and a wider range of smart features, the Fitbit Alta HR is the better choice.
The Final Word: Beyond the Stats
While both trackers offer impressive features and benefits, the best choice for you ultimately boils down to your fitness goals and lifestyle. If you’re a casual user looking for a stylish and affordable tracker to monitor your activity levels, the Fit Smart might be perfect. However, if you’re a serious fitness enthusiast who values heart rate data and advanced features, the Alta HR is the clear winner.
Popular Questions
1. Can I use either tracker for swimming?
Neither the adidas miCoach Fit Smart nor the Fitbit Alta HR is waterproof, so they are not recommended for swimming.
2. Does the Fit Smart offer GPS tracking?
No, the Fit Smart does not have built-in GPS. However, it can utilize your smartphone’s GPS to track your runs and workouts.
3. Can I customize the watch faces on the Alta HR?
Yes, the Alta HR allows you to customize the watch face with different colors and designs.
4. Can I use the Fit Smart with other fitness apps?
The Fit Smart is compatible with the Adidas miCoach app, but it may not be compatible with other fitness apps.
5. How do I charge the Alta HR?
The Alta HR uses a proprietary charging cable that plugs into a USB port.