What To Know
- The Microsoft Band, on the other hand, boasted a more modern and sleek design with a curved OLED display and a slightly larger, more substantial band.
- The Garmin Vivofit Large was a more affordable option compared to the Microsoft Band, making it an attractive choice for budget-conscious users.
- However, if you prioritize a wider range of features, a more advanced design, and a vibrant display, the Microsoft Band offers a more comprehensive and feature-rich experience.
Choosing the right fitness tracker can be a daunting task, especially with the plethora of options available. Two popular contenders in the 2015 fitness tracker market were the Garmin Vivofit Large and the Microsoft Band. Both devices offered a range of features designed to help users track their activity, sleep, and overall health. But which one came out on top? Let’s dive into a detailed comparison to help you make an informed decision.
Design and Comfort
The Garmin Vivofit Large sported a simple, minimalist design with a rectangular display and a comfortable, adjustable band. It was available in a variety of colors, allowing users to personalize their look. The Microsoft Band, on the other hand, boasted a more modern and sleek design with a curved OLED display and a slightly larger, more substantial band. While the Band’s design was aesthetically pleasing, some users found it less comfortable to wear for extended periods, especially during sleep.
Display and User Interface
The Garmin Vivofit Large featured a monochrome LCD display that was easy to read in various lighting conditions. The display was relatively small, but it provided clear information about time, steps, distance, and calories burned. The Microsoft Band, however, offered a vibrant color OLED display that was significantly larger and more visually appealing. The display showcased more detailed information, including heart rate, UV index, and even notifications from your smartphone. The Band’s user interface was also more intuitive and user-friendly, allowing for easier navigation and customization.
Features and Functionality
Both devices offered a solid set of features, but the Microsoft Band edged out the Garmin Vivofit Large in terms of versatility. The Vivofit Large primarily focused on basic activity tracking, including steps, distance, calories burned, and sleep monitoring. It also featured a built-in pedometer and a motivational “move bar” that encouraged users to stay active. The Microsoft Band, however, went beyond basic activity tracking, offering features like heart rate monitoring, sleep analysis, UV index tracking, and even calorie tracking based on your individual metabolism. It also allowed users to receive notifications from their smartphones, making it a more comprehensive fitness and lifestyle tracker.
Battery Life
One of the Vivofit Large‘s biggest strengths was its impressive battery life. It boasted a battery that could last for over a year without needing a recharge, making it a truly low-maintenance option. The Microsoft Band, on the other hand, had a significantly shorter battery life, lasting only a few days on a single charge. This meant users had to remember to charge the device regularly, which could be a hassle for some.
Accuracy and Reliability
Both the Garmin Vivofit Large and the Microsoft Band provided generally accurate data for activity tracking, sleep monitoring, and heart rate. However, the Microsoft Band’s heart rate monitor was generally considered more accurate, especially during intense workouts. The Vivofit Large’s heart rate monitor was less accurate and could sometimes struggle to provide reliable readings during high-intensity activities.
Price and Value
The Garmin Vivofit Large was a more affordable option compared to the Microsoft Band, making it an attractive choice for budget-conscious users. The Microsoft Band, while offering a wider range of features and a more advanced design, came at a higher price point. Ultimately, the best value for money depended on your individual needs and priorities.
The Bottom Line: The Verdict
So, which fitness tracker reigns supreme? The answer depends on your individual needs and preferences. If you’re looking for a simple, affordable, and low-maintenance fitness tracker with excellent battery life, the Garmin Vivofit Large is a solid choice. However, if you prioritize a wider range of features, a more advanced design, and a vibrant display, the Microsoft Band offers a more comprehensive and feature-rich experience.
What You Need to Learn
Q: What is the difference between the Garmin Vivofit Large and the Microsoft Band 2015 in terms of water resistance?
A: The Garmin Vivofit Large is water-resistant up to 5 ATM (50 meters), making it suitable for swimming. The Microsoft Band 2015, on the other hand, is only splash-proof and not suitable for swimming.
Q: Does the Garmin Vivofit Large track sleep?
A: Yes, the Garmin Vivofit Large tracks sleep duration and quality. It monitors your movement throughout the night to determine when you’re asleep and awake.
Q: Can I use the Microsoft Band 2015 to receive notifications from my smartphone?
A: Yes, the Microsoft Band 2015 allows you to receive notifications from your smartphone, including calls, texts, emails, and social media updates.
Q: Which fitness tracker is better for tracking heart rate?
A: The Microsoft Band 2015 generally offers more accurate heart rate tracking compared to the Garmin Vivofit Large, especially during intense workouts.
Q: Can I customize the watch face on the Garmin Vivofit Large?
A: No, the Garmin Vivofit Large does not allow you to customize the watch face. It has a fixed display that shows time, steps, distance, and calories burned.